Article contents
Power, the Dark Triad, and the Organisational Tragedy of the Commons: Knowledge Retention as an Instrument of Domination
Abstract
This article discusses the exercise of power within organisational settings, with emphasis on dysfunctional behaviours associated with the Dark Triad — Machiavellianism, narcissism, and subclinical psychopathy — and on the deliberate retention of knowledge as a strategy of symbolic domination. It is based on the understanding that pursuing power is a legitimate human inclination, but one that, in competitive organisational contexts, can take on manipulative and harmful forms. The study draws on political philosophy and organisational psychology contributions to analyse practices such as the selective favouring of allies, the manipulation of success trajectories, and the restriction of access to knowledge as a means of self-preservation and status maintenance. It also considers the influence of Brazilian cultural elements — marked by centralised leadership styles and low levels of cooperation — which contribute to the reproduction of permissive environments that enable opportunistic profiles to thrive. The study further highlights a gap in the main strands of management theory, which, by prioritising material incentives and formal structures, tend to overlook the effects of symbolic power relations and interpersonal manipulation on organisational performance. It is argued that the absence of precise institutional mechanisms to address such behaviours reflects a lack of theoretical recognition of the problem. The article concludes that understanding knowledge retention as an instrument of domination requires a broader perspective on power dynamics and the incorporation of interdisciplinary approaches that combine ethics, organisational culture, and individual behaviour. Further empirical investigation is recommended, particularly with support from organisational psychology.
Article information
Journal
Journal of Business and Management Studies
Volume (Issue)
7 (2)
Pages
232-238
Published
Copyright
Open access

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
[1] Anderson, C., & Brion, S. (2014). Perspectives on power in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 67–97. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091259
[2] Babiak, P., Neumann, C. S., & Hare, R. D. (2010). Corporate psychopathy: Talking the walk. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 28(2), 174–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.925
[3] Boddy, C. R. (2006). The dark side of management decisions: Organisational psychopaths. Management Decision, 44(10), 1461–1475. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740610715759
[4] Brasil. Tribunal de Contas da União. (2022). Acórdão nº 456/2022 – Plenário. Relator: Ministro Augusto Nardes. Recuperado de https://pesquisa.apps.tcu.gov.br
[5] Erickson, A., Shaw, J. B., & Agabe, Z. (2007). An empirical investigation of the antecedents, behaviors, and outcomes of bad leadership. Journal of Leadership Studies, 1(3), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.20023
[6] Fahey, L., & Prusak, L. (1998). The eleven deadliest sins of knowledge management. California Management Review, 40(3), 265–276.
[7] Greene, R. (2000). As 48 leis do poder (J. G. Ribeiro, Trad.). Rocco. (Obra original publicada em 1998)
[8] Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
[9] Hobbes, T. (2003). Leviatã (J. P. Monteiro & M. B. N. da Silva, Trads.). São Paulo: Abril Cultural. (Obra original publicada em 1651)
[10] Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010). The Dirty Dozen: A concise measure of the Dark Triad. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019265
[11] Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3): A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113514105
[12] Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with power: Politics and influence in organizations. Harvard Business School Press.
[13] Laurijssen, M., & Sanders, S. (2016). Eigen gewin op de werkvloer: Psychopathische persoonlijkheidstrekken positief gerelateerd aan inhaligheid via competitiedrang. Gedrag & Organisatie, 29(4).
[14] May, R. (1982). Poder e inocência: A busca pelas fontes da violência (Á. Cabral, Trad.). Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Guanabara. (Obra original publicada em 1972)
[15] Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. Prentice-Hall.
[16] Nietzsche, F. (1999). Assim falou Zaratustra (M. Claret, Ed.). São Paulo: Martin Claret.
[17] Nunes, R. D. C. (2023). Integrating worker motivation and consumption patterns in modern management theories. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 28(12, Series 7), 34–39. https://www.iosrjournals.org
[18] O’Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2012). A meta‐analytic review of the Dark Triad–intelligence connection. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(5), 598–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.06.001
[19] Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
[20] Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6
[21] Schyns, B., & Schilling, J. (2013). How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 138–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.09.001
[22] Shapiro, C., & Willig, R. D. (1990). Economic rationales for the scope of privatization. Princeton University.
[23] Smith, A. (2009). A teoria dos sentimentos morais (M. B. da Costa, Trad.). Martins Fontes. (Original work published in 1759)
[24] Spain, S. M., Harms, P. D., & LeBreton, J. M. (2014). The dark side of personality at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(S1), S41–S60. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1894
[25] Sun, P., & Scott, J. (2005). An investigation of barriers to knowledge transfer. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(2), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270510590236
[26] Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27–43.
[27] Tepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33(3), 261–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307300812
[28] Wu, J., & LeBreton, J. M. (2011). Reconsidering the use of personality tests in personnel selection contexts. Human Performance, 24(4), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2011.597472
[29] Zweifel, P., & Zaborowski, C. (1996). Employment service: Public or private? Public Choice, 89, 131–1.