Research Article

Collaboration of Stagist Approaches and Discursive Approaches on Ideas & Discourse in “Bela Negara” Policies in Prismatic Communities: Study in Situbondo Regency, Indonesia

Authors

  • Akhmad Juni Toa Lecturer at the Faculty of Economics, Merdeka University, Surabaya
  • Syamsul Maarif Lecturer in Administrative Science Doctoral Study Program, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Jember
  • Edy Wahyudi Lecturer in Administrative Science Doctoral Study Program, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Jember
  • Supranoto Lecturer in Administrative Science Doctoral Study Program, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Jember

Abstract

The “bela negara” program in Situbondo Regency focuses on collaborative efforts between Situbondo Regional Leadership Coordination Forum (Forkopimda) and “Pondok Pesantren” to produce a participatory policy process. Collaboration between the two is important in a prismatic society to accommodate the knowledge each party has in an inclusive public space. Although, to realize collaboration is not easy because it involves complex interests between the two. The study analyses the collaboration of “bela negara” policies in the prismatic Situbondo Regency. The method used in this study is a qualitative method with interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA). The use of the IPA approach in this study is to analyze collaboration on “bela negara” policies in Situbondo Regency, both those carried out by policy actors or the Situbondo Regional Leadership Coordination Forum (Forkopimda) as well as those carried out by the target group or among the clergy. Based on the results of the discussion, it can be concluded that in the “bela negara” policy process in Situbondo Regency, there is a different knowledge construction between the actor and the target group. The Situbondo Regional Leadership Coordination Forum (Forkopimda), as a policy actor, relies on professional knowledge and scientific (indigenous) knowledge. While the target group or the clergy use local knowledge (endogenous). These different types of knowledge arise as a result of different policy approaches. Forkopimda Situbondo, as a policy actor, adopts a stagist or managerial policy approach. While the Ulama use a discursive approach to ideas & discourse that relies on their local knowledge. Even though there are differences in policy approaches, the two of them are able to collaborate well, seen in several activities, as seen in the 74th Anniversary of the Republic of Indonesia and the Commemoration of the 74th National Defense Day (HBN).

Article information

Journal

Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies

Volume (Issue)

5 (9)

Pages

113-120

Published

20-09-2023

How to Cite

Toa, A. J., Maarif, S., Wahyudi, E., & Supranoto. (2023). Collaboration of Stagist Approaches and Discursive Approaches on Ideas & Discourse in “Bela Negara” Policies in Prismatic Communities: Study in Situbondo Regency, Indonesia. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies, 5(9), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.32996/jhsss.2023.5.9.11

Downloads