Research Article

“Moving” Discourse: Egyptian Bumper Stickers as a Communicative Event

Authors

  • Ola Hafez Professor, English Department, College of Arts, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Public discourse, including graffiti, billboards and bumper stickers, is innovative and dynamic, reflecting and often also challenging social values. While graffiti involves defacing public property, bumper-sticker (BS) discourse adds a human “touch” to a metal object, expressing the driver’s identity, and turns the street into an arena for display and communication. The few previous studies of BS discourse explore this type of discourse as a non-traditional means of communication and as a medium of political agency in different societies, with emphasis on the US and Israel. Lammie and Humphreys (2004) classify a corpus of American BSs into nationalistic, ideological, commercial, religious, and philosophical categories. Egyptian BSs, however, remain uninvestigated both linguistically and sociologically. The present paper, combining tools from content analysis, linguistics and ethnomethodology, explores how BSs function differently in Egypt based on a corpus of 581 bumper stickers on private cars, taxis and shuttle microbuses in Cairo. In terms of content, they are argued here to revolve around affiliation (e.g. sport, school, and profession), religion (as an expression of faith and/or invoking God’s protection), and ideology (e.g. photo of Guevara) among other culture-specific conceptual domains. In addition to the content analysis, the paper also analyses BSs in terms of engagement markers, speech acts and intertextuality. The paper concludes with insights regarding the dialogic interactional nature of BSs.

Article information

Journal

International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation

Volume (Issue)

3 (9)

Pages

26-40

Published

2020-09-30

How to Cite

Hafez, O. . (2020). “Moving” Discourse: Egyptian Bumper Stickers as a Communicative Event. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 3(9), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2020.3.9.4

References

Banning, J. (1996). Bumper sticker ethnography: A study of campus culture. The Campus Ecologist, 14 (3), 1- 4. http://www.campusecologist.org/cen/v14n3.htm (accessed August 12, 2008). https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.575.7856&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed September 11, 2020)

Bloch, L.-R. (2000). Mobile discourse: Political bumper stickers as a communication event in Israel. Journal of Communication, 50 (2): 48–76.

Case, C. E. (1992). Bumper stickers and car signs ideology and identity. Journal of Popular Culture, 26 (3): 107–120.

Chiluwa, I. (2008). Religious vehicle stickers in Nigeria: A discourse of identity, faith and social vision. Discourse and Communication, 2 (4): 371-387.

Endersby, J.W. and Towle, M.J. (1996). Tailgate partisanship: Political and social expression through bumper stickers. Social Science Journal, 33 (3): 307-319.

Fairclough, Norman. (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman.

Fiske, J. (1989). Understanding Popular Culture. London: Routledge.

Goffman, E. (1979). Footing. Semiotica, 25: 1-29.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.

Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content Analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

Kristeva, Julia. (1991). Strangers to Ourselves. New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Kurzon, D. (1997). Deixis and background knowledge in the humor of car-bumper stickers. Semiotica, 113 (3/4): 347-368.

Lammie, K. and Humphreys, L. (2004). “No votes for turncoats”: An analysis of bumper stickers at public discourse. Unpublished paper presented at the 2004 annual meeting of the National Communication Association, November 11-14, Chicago, Illinois. <http://convention.allacademic. com/nca2004/session_info.html?c_session_id=2026&dtr_id=1252> (accessed February 12, 2008).

Leech, G.N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.

Mughazy, M. (1999). Pragmatics of the evil eye in Egyptian Arabic. ERIC document, ED 432921.

Newhagen, J. and Ancell, M. (1995). The expression of emotion and social status in the language of bumper stickers. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14 (3): 312-323.

Nilsen, D. (1980). The grammar of graffiti. American Speech, 55 (3): 234-239.

Noble, G. and Baldwin, R. (2001). Sly chicks and troublemakers: Car stickers, nonsense and the allure of strangeness. Social Semiotics, 11 (1): 75-89.

Salamon, H. (2001). Political bumper stickers in contemporary Israel: Folklore as an emotional battleground, Journal of American Folklore, 114 (453): 277-308.

Searle, John R. (1976). The classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5: 1-24.

Shore, Scott. (2003). Bumper sticker stupidity. http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2003/06/02/bumper-sticker-stupidity/ (accessed March 8, 2009).

Downloads

Keywords:

Public discourse, bumper stickers, content analysis, engagement markers, speech acts, intertextuality, identity, Egyptian, Arabic