The Contributions of Systemic Functional Linguistics to Literary Text Analysis

https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2020.3.9.8

Authors

  • Arsen Nahum Pasaribu Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Languages and Arts, University of HKBP Nommensen, Medan, Indonesia
  • Erika Sinambela Senior Lecturer, Postgraduate Program, University of HKBP Nommensen, Medan, Indonesia
  • Sondang Manik Professor, Postgraduate Program, University of HKBP Nommensen, Medan, Indonesia

Keywords:

discourse analysis, contributions, literary text, SFL.

Abstract

Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) refers to some kind of text analysis, including an analysis of literary language. Some research has verified the study of the literary text using this linguistic apparatus; however the use of SFL in literary text analysis is relatively rare. Therefore, this study investigated the contributions of SFL to literary text analysis. The data of the study were 20 scientific articles focusing on literary text analysis using SFL. The analysis used content analysis to expose the segments of the story analyzed and the components of SFL to analyze them. The findings showed that the method of analysis using SFL on the literary text has brought new perspectives to the researchers, and provided some possible future studies in literary works. Moreover, the study of literary texts is regarded not merely as interpretative practices but as explanatory categories for each segment of a literary text.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Dimensions

References

Collerson, J. (1994). English grammar: A functional approach. Newtown, Australia: Primary English Teacher Association.

Cunanan, B.T. (2011). Using transitivity as a framework on stylistic analysis of Virginia Woolf’s ‘Old Mrs. Grey’. Asian EFL Journal Professional Teaching Articles, 54, 69-79.

Eggins, S. (2000). An Introduction to Systemic-Functional Linguistics. London: Continuum.

Downing, A., and Locke, P. (1992). A university course in English grammar. New York: Prentice-Hall.

Gallardo, B.C. (2006). Analysis of a literary work using systemic-functional grammar. Proceedings from the 33rd International Systemic Functional Congress. Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Gerot, L. & Wignell, P. (1995). Making Sense of Functional Grammar, Australia: Gerd Stabler.

Guo, N. (2008). Systemic Functional Grammar and its pedagogical implications. Sino-US English Teaching, (5) (10), 45-50.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1961). Categories of the theory of grammar. Word, 17 (3), 241-292.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1985). Introduction to functional grammar. New York: Routledge.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1990). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold

Halliday, M.A.K. and Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar, New York: Routledge

Lukin, A. (2008). Reading literary texts: Beyond personal resounses. In Z. Fang & M.J Schleppegrell (Eds.), Reading in secondary content areas: A language-based pedagogy (pp. 85-103). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.

Martin, J.R, Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., and Painter, C. (2010). Deploying functional grammar. Beijing: Commercial Press.

Slater, T. and McCrocklin, S. (2006). Learning to use Systemic Functional Linguistics to teach literary analysis: Views on the effectiveness of a short professional development workshop. In L. de Oliveira & M. Schiffner (Eds.), Teaching English Language Arts to English Language Learners: Preparing pre-service and in-service teachers (pp. 193-214). London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

Thompson, G. (2004). Introducing functional grammar (2nd ed.). London, England: Hodder Education

Thomson, G. (2014). Introducing functional grammar (3rd ed.), New York: Routledge.

White, P.P.R. (1998). Telling Media Tales: The News Story as Rhetoric. Unpublished Ph.D. article, University of Sydney, Sydney.

Published

2020-09-30

How to Cite

Pasaribu, A. N., Sinambela, E. ., & Manik, S. . (2020). The Contributions of Systemic Functional Linguistics to Literary Text Analysis. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 3(9), 81-86. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2020.3.9.8