An Investigation of the Factors Contributing to the Subjugation of Rohingya in Myanmar

Abstract

The severity and pervasiveness of the Rohingya problem in Myanmar have attracted international attention. This research investigates whether, in light of international legal and sociopolitical frameworks, the actions taken against the Rohingya community qualify as genocide, ethnic cleansing, or mass murder. It examines evidence of systemic violence, such as forced relocation, sexual assault, and mass executions, by analyzing reports from groups like the UN and Amnesty International. In order to ascertain if the requirements for genocidal intent are satisfied, the study assesses the legal definitions of these terms, paying special attention to the Genocide Convention. Important conclusions point to the existence of state-sponsored initiatives that target the Rohingya in an effort to eradicate their physical and cultural presence, based on their ethnic and religious identity. Although ethnic cleansing has been universally accepted, this study contends that, given the aim to completely or partially eradicate the group, the activities qualify as genocide. The international community's participation is also closely examined, especially its difficulties in successfully acting and prosecuting offenders. Because it affects international responses and accountability measures, this study highlights the significance of using precise terminology when discussing human rights emergencies. This report urges more robust international legal action to stop future atrocities and guarantee justice for the victims by properly classifying the Rohingya persecution. This analysis adds to the continuing discussion about how mass atrocities are classified and what it means for international law and policy.